A
Road Called “Aurangzeb”
“Aurangzeb today would be the equivalent of Caliph El-Baghdadi of the
Islamic State (ISIS), if not Osama Bin Laden or Mullah Omar of the Taliban.
Yet, most Indian Muslims are either not aware of Aurangzeb’s crimes or
choose to relish the thought that he was the one true king who ruled India in
the name of Islam with an iron fist and put Hindus and Sikhs in their rightful
place—at the bottom of the heap.
So I told the Muslims in my audience that if they truly wanted to fight ISIS,
they should take the lead in demanding the erasing of a murderer’s name and
replace it with his brother who is loved by all as the epitome of Hindu-Muslim
brotherhood.” Excerpts from speech by Pakistan
born Canadian – Tarek Fateh.
I took Tarek Fateh seriously till I came across this speech recently about
renaming a road. I, as a frequent visitor to Delhi, knew about
Aurangzeb Road without even caring about it, then how does Tarek Fateh assume,14% Muslims in India relish the thought of a Muslim emperor who ruled with an
iron fist?? I am dead sure they don’t even know who the hell he was!
Tarek Fateh has equated Aurangzeb with OBL or Mullah Omar and strongly
opine, renaming of this road would be instrumental in fighting the ISIS. Can
there be a more ridiculous assumption than this? Replacing the name of a road
will fight the ISIS!! a sane mind cannot be ridiculed more than this hopeless assumption.
Intriguing stories are prevalent about this Mughal ruler and I, having read
a book by Dr. B.N. Pandey-ex-Governor, Orissa, have had an opinion about Aurangzeb based on his contradictory personality.
There are interesting legends about Aurangzeb’s piety, I was told during visit
to Ajmer Dargah of Sufi saint Khwaja Moin Uddin Chishti, about a gate called “Hujjati Darwaza”. It is said,
Aurangzeb while paying visit to this tomb greeted the saint with salam and not
having received any reply twice vowed to destroy the monument if he didn’t
receive reply next time and so when he greeted the third time he was responded
“walekum Salam Aurangzeb Hujjati (stubborn)” by the saint himself .
Another legend says that the emperor wrote Quran by hand and sold them for
living and when a Faqir advised him that God’s book cannot be sold for a price,
he gave it up and took to sewing caps to earn his livelihood.
Dr. B.N Pandey’s researched account gives further details of this villainous
character from the medieval Indian history. According to him, he was
not as cruel to his non-Muslim subjects as he is portrayed to be by right wing historians
who want to re write Indian History on communal grounds. Dr.
Pandey collected information from various sources and concluded that Aurangzeb
issued several Farman between 1659 and 1685, related to grant of jagir (large parcel of
agricultural lands) to support regular maintenance of Hindu and Jain temples.
Dr
Pandey's research showed that Aurangzeb was as solicitous of the rights and
welfare of his non-Muslim subjects as he was of his Muslim subjects. Hindu
plaintiffs received full justice against their Muslims respondents and, if
guilty, Muslims were given punishment as necessary.
One of the greatest charges against Aurangzeb is of the demolition of Vishwanath temple in Banaras (Varanasi). That was a fact, but Dr Pandey unraveled the reason for it. 'While Aurangzeb was passing near Varanasi on his way to Bengal, the Hindu Rajas in his retinue requested that if the halt was made for a day, their Ranis may go to Varanasi, have a dip in the Ganges and pay their homage to Lord Vishwanath. Aurangzeb readily agreed.
After offering puja [worship] all the Ranis returned except one, the Maharani of Kutch. A thorough search was made of the temple precincts but the Rani was to be found nowhere.
'When Aurangzeb came to know of this, he was very much enraged. He sent his senior officers to search for the Rani. Ultimately they found that statue of Lord Ganesh fixed in the wall was a moveable one. When the statue was moved, they saw a flight of stairs that led to the basement. To their horror they found the missing Rani dishonored and crying deprived of all her ornaments. The basement was just beneath Lord Vishwanath's seat.'
The Rajas demanded salutary action, and 'Aurangzeb ordered that as the sacred precincts have been despoiled, Lord Vishwanath may be moved to some other place, the temple be razed to the ground and the Mahant [head priest] be arrested and punished'.
One of the greatest charges against Aurangzeb is of the demolition of Vishwanath temple in Banaras (Varanasi). That was a fact, but Dr Pandey unraveled the reason for it. 'While Aurangzeb was passing near Varanasi on his way to Bengal, the Hindu Rajas in his retinue requested that if the halt was made for a day, their Ranis may go to Varanasi, have a dip in the Ganges and pay their homage to Lord Vishwanath. Aurangzeb readily agreed.
After offering puja [worship] all the Ranis returned except one, the Maharani of Kutch. A thorough search was made of the temple precincts but the Rani was to be found nowhere.
'When Aurangzeb came to know of this, he was very much enraged. He sent his senior officers to search for the Rani. Ultimately they found that statue of Lord Ganesh fixed in the wall was a moveable one. When the statue was moved, they saw a flight of stairs that led to the basement. To their horror they found the missing Rani dishonored and crying deprived of all her ornaments. The basement was just beneath Lord Vishwanath's seat.'
The Rajas demanded salutary action, and 'Aurangzeb ordered that as the sacred precincts have been despoiled, Lord Vishwanath may be moved to some other place, the temple be razed to the ground and the Mahant [head priest] be arrested and punished'.
In my personal opinion, I think of Aurangzeb nothing beyond a mysterious
person who had more negative shades to his persona. Hence, he was no Saint to
me or to any other Muslim. No sane mind will try to justify his actions of
imprisoning his father, murdering two brothers Dara and Murad, killing sufi
saint Shah Sarmad, and Sikh guru Teg bahadur. But then he was a ruler like any
other ruler in history whose survival was linked to suppression of rebellions
and deceit. Yet, I see his another side having read “I came alone and I go as a
stranger. I do not know who I am, nor what I have been doing," the dying
old man confessed to his son, Azam, in February 1707”.
Having expressed myself comprehensively, I am yet to understand, how could
renaming a road be detrimental to a nation already plagued by divisive politics
other than by satiating perverted egos of the modern day Moghuls of New Delhi,
their affiliates and their spiritual mentors. As a matter of fact, APJ Abdul
Kalam deserves much more than just a road named after him and that too after a gesture to intimidate a community..................
Jai Hind...........
May Allah save my beloved motherland .....